What to Expect Using RSD™
Outcomes
-
60% template head start, allowing engineers to focus on unknown behaviors instead of rebuilding foundational work
$5M in recurring costs avoided pre-PDR by moving requirements development off the critical path
Targets management reserve more accurately and creates a virtuous customer loop
A PDR design that closes to the subsystem (L3) level with well-understood risk
-
Requirements developed in parallel, removing them from the program's critical path.
Potential to achieve an earlier Preliminary Design Review (PDR) through improved requirements maturity.
10x (measured) ROI for template development relative to standard pre-PDR model development
Position to deliver success in an increasingly FFP world
-
Based on a 12-month PoP
Design Reference Mission told as a story engages all stakeholders
2,084 linked behaviors generated from reusable behavioral templates
100 system elements, 126 unique signals, and 1,449 item flows connected through 705 interfaces, creating a comprehensive functional architecture
3 mission use cases tracing through ~3100 system (L1) to subsystem (L3) requirements
Metrics specifically identify orphan behaviors and state consistency issues, helping uncover hidden risks early
-
Template captures standardized glossaries, behaviors, use cases, states, interfaces, and requirements for reuse across projects.
Template development effort prioritized long-term value, with 27% devoted to behavioral template creation and 21% to requirements development, creating reusable assets rather than one-off documents.
Continuous template refinement reduces style variation and captures lessons learned for future programs